SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
 


FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                       to ____________  ____________

Commission file number 0-10909

NEOSTEM, INC. 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
22-2343568
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
   
420 LEXINGTON AVE, SUITE 450 NEW YORK, NEW YORK
10170
(Address of principal executive offices)
(zip code)

Issuer's telephone number, including area code: 212-584-4180
 
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o
Accelerated filer o
   
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
 
6,052,015 SHARES, $.001 PAR VALUE, AS OF August 13, 2008

(Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date)


 
I N D E X

 
 
Page No.
Part I - Financial Information:  
   
     
Item 1.
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
 
     
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
3
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
4
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
5
     
     
 
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
6-14
     
     
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
15-18
     
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
19
     
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
19
     
Part II - Other Information:
   
     
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
20
     
     
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
20
     
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
20
     
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securityholders
20
     
Item 5.
Other Information
20
     
Item 6.
Exhibits
20
     
 
Signatures
21

-2-


NEOSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

 
 
 
June 30,
2008
 
December 31,
2007
 
ASSETS
             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
529,095
 
$
2,304,227
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $19,500
   
31,130
   
24,605
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
106,121
   
46,248
 
               
Total current assets
   
666,346
   
2,375,080
 
               
Property and equipment, net
   
129,456
   
164,122
 
Goodwill
   
558,169
   
558,169
 
Intangible Asset
   
669,000
   
669,000
 
Other assets
   
4,361
   
8,778
 
               
   
$
2,027,332
 
$
3,775,149
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
Current liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
 
$
138,337
 
$
158,453
 
Accrued liabilities
   
80,897
   
228,726
 
Note payable, due related party - current portion
   
-
   
24,022
 
Notes payable
   
45,415
   
4,720
 
Unearned revenues
   
2,669
   
2,902
 
Capitalized lease obligations - current portion
   
28,060
   
25,406
 
Total current liabilities
   
295,378
   
444,229
 
               
Capitalized lease obligations
   
-
   
14,726
 
               
Total Liabilities
   
295,378
   
458,955
 
               
Stockholders’ Equity:
             
Preferred stock; authorized, 5,000,000 shares Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock, liquidation value 10 shares of common stock per share; $0.01 par value; authorized, 825,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 10,000 shares
    100     100  
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized, 500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 6,023,212 June 30, 2008 and 4,826,055 December 31, 2007
   
6,023
   
4,826
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
37,625,669
   
34,802,309
 
Unearned compensation
   
(258,638
)
 
(738,803
)
Accumulated deficit
   
(35,641,200
)
 
(30,752,238
)
               
Total stockholders’ equity
   
1,731,954
   
3,316,194
 
               
   
$
2,027,332
 
$
3,775,149
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

-3-


NEOSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
2008
 
2007
 
Earned revenues
 
$
23,528
 
$
6,017
 
$
24,221
 
$
61,912
 
Direct costs
   
(3,908
)
 
(2,350
)
 
(3,908
)
 
(3,603
)
Gross profit
   
19,620
   
3,667
   
20,313
   
58,309
 
Selling, general and administrative
   
2,379,387
   
1,960,393
   
4,903,718
   
3,835,746
 
Operating loss
   
(2,359,767
)
 
(1,956,726
)
 
(4,883,405
)
 
(3,777,437
)
Other income (expense):
                         
Interest income
   
1,712
   
2,874
   
1,712
   
15,224
 
Interest expense
   
(3,718
)
 
(4,409
)
 
(7,269
)
 
(12,383
)
 
                             
Net loss
 
$
(2,361,773
)
$
(1,958,261
)
$
(4,888,962
)
$
(3,774,596
)
                           
Net loss per common share
   
($0.43
)
 
($0.74
)
 
($0.94
)
 
($1.47
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding
   
5,490,257
   
2,657,053
   
5,196,717
   
2,564,806
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

-4-


NEOSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

 
 
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
           
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
             
Net loss
 
$
(4,888,962
)
$
(3,774,596
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
             
Common shares issued and stock options granted for services rendered and interest expense
   
2,407,961
   
1,326,253
 
Depreciation
   
41,462
   
19,943
 
Deferred acquisition costs
   
   
1,253
 
               
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
             
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
(59,872
)
 
(97,125
)
Accounts receivable
   
(6,525
)
 
(37,202
)
Unearned revenues
   
(233
)
 
4,482
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities
   
(191,967
)
 
(66,873
)
               
Net cash used in operating activities
   
(2,698,136
)
 
(2,653,865
)
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
             
Acquisition property and equipment
   
(2,379
)
 
(19,194
)
Net cash used in investing activities
   
(2,379
)
 
(19,194
)
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
             
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
   
896,760
   
2,320,055
 
Proceeds from advances on notes payable
   
131,618
   
138,232
 
Payments of capitalized lease obligations
   
(12,072
)
 
(11,645
)
Repayments of notes payable
   
(90,923
)
 
(154,860
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
925,383
   
2,291,782
 
               
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
   
(1,775,132
)
 
(351,277
)
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
   
2,304,227
   
436,659
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
529,095
 
$
85,382
 
 
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
             
Cash paid during the period for:
             
Interest
 
$
7,269
 
$
12,383
 
               
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Financing Activities:
             
Issuance of common stock for capital commitment
   
-
   
165,000
 
Issuance of restricted common stock for services
   
-
   
233,952
 
Issuance of common stock for services rendered
   
476,842
   
95,704
 
Issuance of common stock for compensation
   
66,515
   
55,410
 
Issuance of warrants for services
   
109,958
   
202,292
 
Issuance of common stock for payment of debt
   
5,647
   
-
 
Compensatory element of stock options
   
1,202,223
   
573,895
 
Vesting of restricted common stock during period
   
546,776
   
233,952
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
-5-

 
NEOSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - The Company

NeoStem, Inc. (“NeoStem”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in September 1980 under the name Fidelity Medical Services, Inc.  Our corporate headquarters is located at 420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 450, New York, NY 10170, our telephone number is (212) 584-4180 and our website address is www.neostem.com
 
NeoStem is engaged in a platform business of operating a commercial autologous (donor and recipient are the same) adult stem cell bank and is pioneering the pre-disease collection, processing and long-term storage of stem cells from adult donors that they can access for their own future medical treatment.  We are managing a network of adult stem cell collection centers in major metropolitan areas of the United States. We have also entered the research and development arenas, through the acquisition of a worldwide exclusive license to an early-stage technology to identify and isolate rare stem cells from adult human bone marrow, called VSEL (very small embryonic-like) stem cells. VSELs have many physical characteristics typically found in embryonic stem cells, including the ability to differentiate into specialized cells found in substantially all the different types of cells and tissue that make up the body. On January 19, 2006, we consummated the acquisition of the assets of NS California, Inc., a California corporation (“NS California”) relating to NS California’s business of collecting and storing adult stem cells.  Effective with the acquisition, the business of NS California became our principal business, rather than our historic business of providing capital and business guidance to companies in the healthcare and life science industries.  The Company provides adult stem cell processing, collection and banking services with the goal of making stem cell collection and storage widely available, so that the general population will have the opportunity to store their own stem cells for future healthcare needs. 
 
Prior to the NS California acquisition, the business of the Company was to provide capital and business guidance to companies in the healthcare and life science industries, in return for a percentage of revenues, royalty fees, licensing fees and other product sales of the target companies. Additionally, through June 30, 2002, the Company was a provider of extended warranties and service contracts via the Internet at warrantysuperstore.com. From June 2002 to March 2007 the Company was engaged in the "run off" of such extended warranties and service contracts. As of March 31, 2007 the recognition of revenue from the sale of extended warranties and service contracts was completed.

On August 29, 2006, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our Common Stock at a ratio of one-for-ten shares and to change our name from Phase III Medical, Inc. to NeoStem, Inc.  This reverse stock split was effective as of August 31, 2006. On June 14, 2007, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio between one-for-three and one-for-ten shares in the event it was deemed necessary by the Company’s Board of Directors to be accepted onto a securities exchange. On July 9, 2007, the Board authorized the reverse stock split at a ratio of one-for-ten shares to be effective upon the initial closing of the Company’s public offering in order to satisfy the listing requirements of The American Stock Exchange. On August 9, 2007 the reverse stock split was effective and the Company's Common Stock commenced trading on The American Stock Exchange under the symbol "NBS." All shares and per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the reverse stock splits effective as of August 9, 2007.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-6-

 
Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NeoStem, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NeoStem Therapies, Inc. and Stem Cell Technologies, Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.


Accounting for Stock Option Compensation: In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"). SFAS No. 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as an expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. The Company determines value of stock options by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The value of options issued during 2008 and 2007 or that were unvested at January 1, 2007 are being recognized as an operating expense ratably on a monthly basis over the vesting period of each option.

Earnings Per Share: Basic (loss)/earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net (loss)/income available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss)/earnings per share, which is calculated by dividing net (loss)/income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding, is not presented as it is anti-dilutive in all periods presented.

Revenue Recognition: The Company initiated the collection and banking of autologous adult stem cells in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company recognizes revenue related to the collection and cryopreservation of autologous adult stem cells when the cryopreservation process is completed which is generally twenty four hours after cells have been collected. Revenue related to advance payments of storage fees is recognized ratably over the period covered by the advanced payments. The Company also earns revenue, in the form of start up fees, from physicians seeking to establish autologous adult stem cell collection centers. These fees are generally in consideration of the Company providing access to the Company’s know how, procedures and trademarks and in certain cases establishing a service territory for the physician. Start up fees are recognized once the agreement has been signed and the physician has been qualified by the Company’s credentialing committee. If there are any deliverables associated with the startup of a physician practice that portion of the start up fee will be deferred until such deliverable is completed.

Warranty and service contract reinsurance premiums are recognized on a pro rata basis over the policy term. The deferred policy acquisition costs are the net cost of acquiring new and renewal insurance contracts. These costs are charged to expense in proportion to net premium revenue recognized. The provisions for losses and loss-adjustment expenses include an amount determined from loss reports on individual cases and an amount based on past experience for losses incurred but not reported. Such liabilities are necessarily based on estimates, and while management believes that the amount is adequate, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts provided. The methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting liability are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings currently. The Company had sold, via the Internet, through partnerships and directly to consumers, extended warranty service contracts for seven major consumer products. The Company recognized revenue ratably over the length of the contract. The Company purchased insurance to fully cover any losses under the service contracts from a domestic carrier. The insurance premium and other costs related to the sale are amortized over the life of the contract. Recognition of Revenue related to this line of business ended March 31, 2007.

Note 3 - Notes Payable
 
In connection with the NS California acquisition, the Company assumed a 6% note payable due a former officer of NS California in the amount of $15,812. As of December 31, 2007, $1,313 remained unpaid. Final payment was made in January, 2008.

The Company has financed certain insurance polices and has notes payable at June 30, 2008 in the amount of $45,415 related to these policies. These notes require monthly payments and mature in less than one year.

-7-


Note 4 - Other Obligations
In November 2007, the Company acquired the exclusive, worldwide rights to very small embryonic like (VSEL) technology developed by researchers at the University of Louisville. These rights were acquired through the Company’s acquisition of Stem Cell Technologies, Inc., the licensee to a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with the University of Louisville. Concurrent with acquiring these rights, the Company entered into a sponsored research agreement (the "Sponsored Research Agreement" or "SRA") with the University of Louisville Research Foundation (“ULRF”) under which the Company will support further research in the laboratory of Mariusz Ratajczak, M.D., Ph.D., a co-inventor of the VSEL technology and head of the Stem Cell Biology Program at the James Graham Brown Cancer Center at the University of Louisville. The term of the research is two and one-half years and shall commence after all applicable institution (e.g., institutional review board ("IRB")) and Federal approvals are obtained and upon the adult stem cell specimens required for the research being provided to the laboratory. The License Agreement requires the payment of certain license fees, royalties and milestone payments, payments for patent filings and applications and the use of due diligence in developing and commercializing the VSEL technology. The SRA requires periodic and milestone payments. All payments required to be made to date have been made. Under the License Agreement, upon the commencement of the research (which has not yet occurred pending receipt of IRB approvals and collection of the appropriate samples), the Company will be required to make payments of $66,000 in license issue fees and prepayment of patent costs and will be responsible for additional patent-related costs. Thereafter, an annual license maintenance fee of $10,000 will be required upon the issuance of a licensed patent and royalties will be payable based upon the sale of certain licensed products. Under the Sponsored Research Agreement, the Company agreed to support the research as set forth in a research plan in an amount of $375,000. Such costs are to be paid by the Company in accordance with a payment schedule which sets forth the timing and condition of each such payment over the term of the SRA, the first payment of $100,000 (for which there is a $50,000 credit) being due upon the commencement of the research. We will require additional research and development capacity and access to funds to meet our development obligations under the License Agreement and develop the VSEL technology. The Company has applied for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants and may also seek to obtain funds through applications for other State and Federal grants, direct investments, sublicensing arrangements as well as other funding sources to help offset all or a portion of these costs We are seeking to develop increased internal research capability and sufficient laboratory facilities or establish relationships with third parties to provide such research capability and facilities. In this regard, in July 2008 the Company hired a Director of Stem Cell Research and Laboratory Operations.

Note 5 - Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock:
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company entered into a one year consulting agreement with a financial services firm, pursuant to which this firm is providing consulting services during the term to the Company consisting of (i) reviewing the Company's financial requirements; (ii) analyzing and assessing alternatives for the Company's financial requirements; (iii) providing introductions to professional analysts and money managers; (iv) assisting the Company in financing arrangements to be determined and governed by separate and distinct financing agreements; (v) providing analysis of the Company's industry and competitors in the form of general industry reports provided directly to the Company; and (vi) assisting the Company in developing corporate partnering relationships. As consideration for these services, in February 2008, the Company issued to the consultant, (i) 50,000 shares of Common Stock; and (ii) two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of Common Stock. This issuance of this stock resulted in a charge to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $80,000 and $59,000 for the vested portion of the two warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2008 . The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained in February 2008. This issuance of securities was approved by the Board of Directors.

In January 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Robin L. Smith, its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Dr. Smith's employment agreement dated as of May 26, 2006 and amended as of January 26, 2007 and September 27, 2007 was further amended to provide that, in response to the Company’s efforts to conserve cash, $50,000 of her 2008 salary would be paid in shares of the Company’s Common Stock, the number of shares to be issued was reduced by the amount of cash required to pay the withholding taxes associated with this amount of salary. Accordingly, Dr. Smith was issued 16,574 shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Participation Plan (the “2003 EPP”) resulting in a charge to operations of $28,176. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In January 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Catherine M. Vaczy, its Vice President and General Counsel, pursuant to which Ms. Vaczy’s employment agreement dated as of January 26, 2007 was amended to provide that, in response to the Company’s efforts to conserve cash, Ms. Vaczy would be paid $11,250 of her 2008 salary in shares of the Company’s Common Stock, the number of shares to be issued was reduced by the amount of cash required to pay the withholding taxes associated with this amount of salary. Accordingly, Ms. Vaczy was issued 3,729 shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the 2003 EPP resulting in a charge to operations of $6,339. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

-8-

 
In January 2008, the Company terminated an agreement with a consultant to the Company. In connection with the cancellation of this agreement, 5,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, previously issued, were surrendered by the consultant.

In January 2008, the Company issued 7,500 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to a consultant to the Company pursuant to the 2003 EPP resulting in a charge to operations of $13,475. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In February 2008, the Company entered into a one year consulting agreement with a law firm to assist in funding efforts from the State and Federal Governments as well as other assignments from time to time, in consideration for which it issued to the firm 40,000 shares that vest ratably on a monthly basis during 2008. The issuance of the shares was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, such approval was obtained in March 2008, and following this approval the shares were issued. The shares issued in connection with this agreement had a value of $72,800 which is being recognized as an operating expense over the term of the agreement, and has resulted in a charge to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $30,000. This issuance of shares was approved by the Board of Directors.

On February 15, 2008, the Company entered into a six month engagement agreement with a financial advisor pursuant to which they are acting as the Company’s exclusive financial advisor for the term in connection with a potential acquisition of a revenue generating business, in the United States or abroad, or similar transaction. As partial consideration, the Company will issue shares of Common Stock with a $45,000 value based on the five day average of the closing prices of the Common Stock preceding the date of issuance which shall be paid on a pro rata basis during the term of the agreement. The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange. Such approval was obtained in March 2008, and following that approval the Company has issued to the financial advisor, through June 30, 2008, payments in stock under the agreement totaling 30,058 shares resulting in a charge to operations of $38,608. This issuance of shares was approved by the Board of Directors.

In February 2008, the Company issued 20,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s Director of Government Affairs pursuant to the 2003 EPP resulting in a charge to operations of $32,000. The issuance of the shares was in lieu of salary payable in connection with such individual serving as the vice president of the Stem for Life Foundation (“SFLF”), a not for profit corporation which the Company participated in founding.  In April 2008, this individual resigned from her position as Director, Government Affairs with the Company and VP of SFLF. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In February 2008, the Company issued 5,325 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to a consultant to the Company pursuant to the 2003 EPP. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors resulting in a charge to operations of $8,646.

In February 2008, the Company entered into a six month advisory services agreement with a financial securities firm whereby this firm is providing financial consulting services and advice to the Company pertaining to its business affairs. In consideration for such services, the Company has agreed to issue 150,000 shares of common stock that shall be issued over the term of the advisory services agreement, provided that the advisory services agreement continues to be in effect. The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained on March 20, 2008, and on that date the Company issued under the advisory services agreement the initial payments in stock totaling 50,000 shares. Through June 30, 2008 a total of 90,000 shares have been issued, resulting in a charge to operations of $141,200. This issuance of shares was approved by the Board of Directors. The Company has terminated this Agreement and the remaining 60,000 shares will not be issued.

In February 2008, the Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with an investor relations advisor who has provided investor relations and media services to the Company since 2005. In consideration for providing services under the consulting agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the advisor an aggregate of 50,000 shares of common stock. The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange. Such approval was obtained on March 20, 2008 and on that date these shares were issued, resulting in a charge to operations of $85,000. This issuance of shares was approved by the Board of Directors.

In April 2008, the Company entered into a one month non-exclusive investment banking agreement in connection with the possible issuances by the Company of equity, debt and/or convertible securities. In partial consideration for such services, the Company agreed to issue 9,146 shares of common stock as a retainer. The term of this agreement was extended. The issuance of the securities under this agreement was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained and on May 21, 2008 the 9,146 retainer shares were issued. This bank participated in the May 2008 private placement (as described below). The value of this stock is $7,400. This issuance of shares was approved by the Board of Directors.

-9-

 
In May 2008, the Company completed a private placement of securities pursuant to which $900,000 in gross proceeds were raised (the “May 2008 private placement”). On May 20 and May 21, 2008, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements (the "Subscription Agreements") with 16 accredited investors (the "Investors"). Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, the Company issued to each Investor units (the "Units") comprised of one share of its common stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Stock") and one redeemable five-year warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.75 per share (the "Warrants"), at a per-Unit price of $1.20. The Warrants are not exercisable for a period of six months and are redeemable by the Company if the Common Stock trades at a price equal to or in excess of $2.40 for a specified period of time. In the May 2008 private placement, the Company issued an aggregate of 750,006 Units to Investors consisting of 750,006 shares of Common Stock and 750,006 redeemable Warrants, for an aggregate purchase price of $900,000. Dr. Robin L. Smith, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, purchased 16,667 Units for a purchase price of $20,000 and Catherine M. Vaczy, the Company’s Vice President and General Counsel, purchased 7,500 Units for a purchase price of $9,000. New England Cryogenic Center, Inc. (“NECC”), one of the largest full-service cryogenic laboratories in the world and a strategic partner of the Company since October 2007, also participated in the offering. Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreements, the Company was required to prepare and file (and did so on a timely basis) no later than forty-five days (with certain exceptions) after the closing of the May 2008 private placement, a Registration Statement with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock issued to Investors and the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants, which was filed on July 1, 2008. In connection with the May 2008 private placement, the Company paid as finders’ fees to accredited investors, cash in the amount of $3,240 and issued five year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 35,703 shares of Common Stock (see “Warrants,” below). Cash in the amount of 4% of the proceeds received by the Company from the future exercise of 30,000 of the Investor Warrants is also payable to one of the finders.

In May 2008, the Company entered into a two month agreement with a sales and marketing consultant pursuant to which the consultant will provide consultation services to the Company relating to business development, operations and staffing matters. In consideration for such services, the Company agreed to issue to the Consultant pursuant to the 2003 EPP: (i) 20,000 shares of Common Stock which shall vest as to 10,000 shares on the last day of each 30 day period during the term of the consulting agreement; and (ii) an option to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of grant that shall vest and become exercisable as to 10,000 shares of Common Stock on the last day of each 30 day period during the term of the consulting agreement, subject in each case to the continued effectiveness of the agreement. All of such shares are subject to a six month period during which Consultant has agreed none of these shares will be sold. The issuance of the equities resulted in a charge to operations of $27,600 for the Common Stock that was issued and $17,153 for the vested portion of the stock options. This issuance of securities was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In May 2008, the Company entered into a two month agreement with a consultant pursuant to which the consultant will provide services to the Company relating to government affairs and related areas. In consideration for such services, the Company agreed to issue to the Consultant pursuant to the 2003 EPP: (i) 20,000 shares of Common Stock which shall vest as to 10,000 shares on the last day of each 30 day period during the term of the consulting agreement; and (ii) an option to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of grant that shall vest and become exercisable as to 10,000 shares of Common Stock on the last day of each 30 day period during the term of the consulting agreement, subject in each case to the continued effectiveness of the agreement. All of such shares are subject to a six month period during which Consultant has agreed none of the shares will be sold. The issuance of these equities resulted in a charge to operations of $26,000 for the Common Stock that was issued and $17,715 for the vested portion of the stock options. This issuance of securities was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In May 2008, the Company issued to a business development consultant for services previously rendered, 1,000 shares of Common Stock under the 2003 EPP which vested immediately. The issuance of these shares resulted in a charge to operations of $960. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

In May 2008, the Company entered into a three month consulting agreement with a public relations and communications consultant focusing on specific consumer demographics. As partial consideration for these services, the Company agreed to issue: (i) 20,000 shares of Common Stock on each of (a) the date of execution of the agreement (the “Execution Date”), (b) thirty days after the Execution Date, and (c) sixty days after the Execution Date; and (ii) a five year warrant to purchase up to 30,000 shares of Common Stock (as described under “Warrants,” below), exercisable as to 10,000 shares each at $3.00, $4.00 and $5.00, respectively. The issuance of the securities under this agreement was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained on June 20, 2008 and the initial payments in Common Stock and the Warrant were issued. Through June 30, 2008, the Company issued 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock resulting in a charge to operations of $36,800. This issuance of securities was approved by the Board of Directors. On July 26, 2008, the Company terminated this Agreement and the final 20,000 shares will not be issued.

-10-

 
In June 2008, the Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with an investor relations advisor. As consideration for these services, the Company issued (i) 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, vesting as to 25,000 shares on the date of execution of the consulting agreement and 25,000 shares 91 days thereafter, which resulted in a charge to operations of $42,500 and (ii) a five year warrant to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 shares of Common Stock (as described under “Warrants” below). The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained on June 20, 2008 and the initial payment in Common Stock and the Warrant were issued. This issuance of securities was approved by the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company was required to prepare and file (and did so on a timely basis) no later than July 3, 2008, a Registration Statement with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock issued to the consultant and the shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant.

Warrants:
The Company has issued common stock purchase warrants from time to time to investors in private placements, certain vendors, underwriters, and directors and officers of the Company. A total of 3,173,397 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2008 at prices ranging from $1.00 to $12.00 and expiring through June 2014.

In January 2008, the Company entered into a one year consulting agreement with a financial services firm (as described under “Common Stock” above). As consideration for these services, in February 2008, the Company issued to the consultant, (i) 50,000 shares of Common Stock; and (ii) two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of Common Stock. The first warrant grants the consultant the right to purchase up to 20,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price equal to $2.00; and the second Warrant grants the consultant the right to purchase up to 100,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price equal to $5.00, all as set forth in the Warrants. The Warrants shall vest on a pro rata basis so long as services continue to be provided under the agreement and are exercisable until January 1, 2013, resulting in a charge to operations of $59,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained in February 2008.

In May 2008, the Company completed a private placement of securities pursuant to which $900,000 in gross proceeds were raised (as described under “Common Stock,” above). Pursuant to the May 2008 private placement, the Company issued to each Investor units comprised of one share of Common Stock and one redeemable five-year warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.75 per share (the "Warrants"), at a per-Unit price of $1.20. The Warrants are not exercisable for a period of six months and thereafter are exercisable through May 19, 2013, and are redeemable by the Company if the Common Stock trades at a price equal to or in excess of $2.40 for a specified period of time. The Investors received certain registration rights for the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants, as described under “Common Stock,” above, and in July 2008 the Company timely filed a registration statement relating thereto. The warrants issued in connection with offering have a fair value of $518,000. As also described, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 35,705 shares of Common Stock in partial payment of finder’s fees (the “Finder’s Warrants”), which Finder’s Warrants contain generally the same terms as the Warrants except they contain a cashless exercise feature and have piggyback registration rights for the resale of the shares underlying the Finder’s Warrants. The Finder Warrants have a fair value of $23,500.

In May 2008, the Company entered into a three month consulting agreement with a public relations and communications consultant focusing on specific consumer demographics (as described under “Common Stock,” above). As partial consideration for these services, the Company issued a five year warrant to purchase up to 30,000 shares of Common Stock, exercisable as to 10,000 shares each at $3.00, $4.00 and $5.00, respectively, all as set forth in the Warrant. The issuance of the securities under this agreement was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained on June 20, 2008 and the initial payments in Common Stock and the Warrant were issued. The Warrant is exercisable through June 19, 2013. This issuance of securities was approved by the Board of Directors. The issuance of the Warrant resulted in a charge to operations of $19,828.

In June 2008, the Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with an investor relations advisor (as described under “Common Stock,” above). As partial consideration for these services, the Company issued to the advisor, a five year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock, vesting as to 41,667 shares on the date of execution of the consulting agreement (the “Execution Date”) and each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth monthly anniversaries of the Execution Date (each, a “Vesting Date”) (except it shall vest as to 41,666 shares on the fourth and fifth anniversaries); provided, that on each Vesting Date the consulting agreement shall continue to be in effect, at an exercise price per share as follows: (a) as to 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, (b) as to an additional 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.30 per share, (c) as to an additional 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.75 per share; (d) as to an additional 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, and (e) as to an additional 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, all as set forth in the Warrant. The issuance of the securities under this agreement was subject to the approval of the American Stock Exchange, which approval was obtained in June 2008 and the initial payments in Common Stock and the Warrant were issued. The Warrant is exercisable until June 19, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, and as described under “Common Stock,” above, the Company was required to prepare and file (and did so on a timely basis) no later than July 3, 2008, a Registration Statement with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock issued to the consultant and the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant. The issuance of the Warrant resulted in a charge to operations of $37,420 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

-11-

 
At June 30, 2008 the outstanding warrants by range of exercise prices are as follows:
 
   
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Exercise Price
 
June 30, 2008
 
Contractual Life (years)
 
June 30, 2008
 
$1.00 to $ 3.20
   
1,165,709
   
4.87
   
1,105,709
 
$3.20 to $ 5.40
   
84,250
   
2.66
   
84,250
 
$5.40 to $ 7.60
   
802,761
   
4.19
   
707,511
 
$7.60 to $ 9.80
   
1,088,678
   
3.92
   
1,088,678
 
$9.80 to $12.00
   
31,999
   
.52
   
31,999
 
     
3,173,397
         
3,018,147
 

Options:

The Company’s 2003 Equity Participation Plan permits the grant of share options and shares to its employees, Directors, consultants and advisors for up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock as stock compensation. All stock options under the 2003 EPP are generally granted at the fair market value of the common stock at the grant date. Employee stock options vest ratably over a period determined at time of grant and generally expire 10 years from the grant date.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company’s 2003 EPP is accounted for in accordance with the recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("FAS 123(R)"), which replaces FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. FAS 123 (R) requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions, including employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements. In addition, the Company adheres to the guidance set forth within Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, which provides the Staff's views regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations with respect to the valuation of share-based payments for public companies.

The Company's results included share-based compensation expense of $556,802 and $368,078 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and $1,202,223 and $573,895 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Such amounts have been included in the consolidated statements of operations within general and administrative expenses.

Stock option compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire portion of the award.

The range of assumptions made in calculating the fair values of options are as follows:

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
2008
 
2007
 
Expected term (in years)
   
10
   
10
   
10
   
10
 
Expected volatility
   
100% to 140
%
 
133
%
 
100% to 140
%
 
133% to 152
%
                           
Expected dividend yield
   
0
%
 
0
%
 
0
%
 
0
%
                           
Risk-free interest rate
   
3.83% to 4.19
%
 
4.95
%
 
3.64% to 4.19
%
 
4.51% to 4.95
%

-12-

 
Stock option activity under the 2003 Equity Participation Plan is as follows:

           
Weighted
 
Weighted Average
 
Aggregate
 
   
Number of 
 
Range of
 
Average
 
Remaining
 
Intrinsic
 
   
Shares (1) 
 
Exercise Price
 
Exercise Price
 
Contractual Term
 
Value
 
Balance at December 31, 2007
   
1,113,800
 
$
1.70 - $25.00
 
$
5.66
             
Granted
   
795,500
 
$
0.95 - $1.67
 
$
1.59
             
Exercised
   
-
   
-
   
-
             
Expired
   
-
   
-
   
-
             
Cancelled
   
(129,500
)
 
-
 
$
3.59
             
Balance at June 30, 2008
   
1,779,800
 
$
0.95 - $25.00
 
$
4.00
   
8.45
 
$
-
 
                                 
Vested and Exercisable at June 30, 2008
   
1,013,216
       
4.75
   
7.78
 
$
-
 
 
(1) — All options are exercisable for a period of ten years.
 
   
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Exercise Price
 
June 30, 2008
 
Contractual Life (years)
 
June 30, 2008
 
$0.95 to $ 4.36
   
821,500
   
9.64
   
337,500
 
$4.36 to $ 7.77
   
867,200
   
8.52
   
592,616
 
$ 7.77 to $ 11.18
   
50,000
   
7.58
   
42,000
 
$11.18 to $14.59
 
 
3,000
   
5.67
   
3,000
 
$14.59 to $25.00
   
38,100
   
6.97
   
38,100
 
     
1,779,800
         
1,013,216
 

Options are usually granted at an exercise price at least equal to the fair value of the common stock at the grant date and may be granted to employees, Directors, consultants and advisors of the Company.


As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $2,021,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock option awards of which $307,000 of unrecognized compensation expense is related to stock options that vest over a weighted average life of .8 years. The balance of $1,714,000 of unrecognized compensation costs is related to stock options that vest based on the accomplishment of business milestones.
 
   
Options
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
 
Non-Vested at December 31, 2007
   
432,668
 
$
4.94
 
Issued
   
795,500
   
1.50
 
Canceled
   
(129,500
)
 
3.54
 
Vested
   
(332,084
)
 
2.12
 
Non-Vested at March 31, 2008
   
766,584
 
$
2.99
 
 
The total value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $1,202,223.

-13-

 
Note 6 - Segment Information
Until April 30, 2001, the Company operated in two segments; as a reinsuror and as a seller of extended warranty service contracts through the Internet. The reinsurance segment has been discontinued and the Company’s remaining revenues are derived from the run-off of its sale of extended warranties and service contracts via the Internet. Additionally, the Company established a new business in the banking of adult autologous stem cells sector. The Company’s operations are conducted entirely in the U.S. Although the Company has realized minimal revenue from the banking of adult autologous stem cells, the Company will be operating in two segments until the “run-off” is completed. As of March 31, 2007 the run off of the sale of extended warranties and service contracts was completed.

Note 7 - Related Party Transactions
On January 20, 2006, Mr. Robert Aholt, Jr. tendered his resignation as Chief Operating Officer of the Company. In connection therewith, on March 31, 2006, the Company and Mr. Aholt entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Aholt the aggregate sum of $250,000 (less applicable Federal and California state and local withholdings and payroll deductions), payable, initially over a period of two years in biweekly installments of $4,807.69 commencing on April 7, 2006, except that the first payment was in the amount of $9,615. In July, 2006 this agreement was amended to call for semi-monthly payments of $10,417 for the remaining 21 months. In the event the Company breaches its payment obligations under the Settlement Agreement and such breach remains uncured, the full balance owed shall become due. The Company and Mr. Aholt each provided certain general releases. Mr. Aholt also agreed to continue to be bound by his obligations not to compete with the Company and to maintain the confidentiality of Company proprietary information. At December 31, 2007, $24,022 was due Mr. Aholt pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement which was paid, in full, in the quarter ending March 31, 2008.

In October 2007, the Company entered into a three month consulting agreement with Matthew Henninger pursuant to which he agreed to provide services as a business consultant in areas requested by the Company, including financial analysis projects and acquisition target analysis. As compensation for these services, pursuant to the agreement he was entitled to receive a cash fee of $8,333 payable each month during the term of the agreement as well as a fee in the event a transaction was effected during the term as a result of the performance of the consultant’s services. In January 2008, the Company and the consultant entered into an agreement whereby the consultant agreed to accept in satisfaction of his final payment under the agreement, 4,902 shares of the Company’s common stock issued under and pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2003 Equity Participation Plan based on the fair market value of the common stock on the date of approval by the Company’s Compensation Committee. No other fee was paid. The consultant is currently in an exclusive relationship with the Company’s CEO.

Note 8 - Subsequent Events

As described under “Common Stock” under Note 5, above, on February 15, 2008, the Company entered into a six month engagement agreement with a financial advisor pursuant to which they are acting as the Company’s exclusive financial advisor for the term in connection with a potential acquisition of a revenue generating business, in the United States or abroad, or similar transaction. As partial consideration, the Company agreed to issue shares of Common Stock with a $45,000 value based on the five day average of the closing prices of the Common Stock preceding the date of issuance which shall be paid on a pro rata basis during the term of the agreement. On July 15, 2008, the Company issued 8,803 shares of Common Stock to the financial advisor pursuant to this agreement; the value of these shares is approximately $7,000.

In July 2008, the Company entered into a two month extension of its agreement with the sales and marketing consultant described in “Common Stock” under Note 5, above, pursuant to which the consultant will continue to provide consultation services to the Company relating to business development, operations and staffing matters. In consideration for such services, the Company has agreed to issue to the Consultant pursuant to the 2003 EPP (i) 20,000 shares of Common Stock which shall vest as to 10,000 shares on the last day of each 30 day period during the term of the extended consulting agreement; and (ii) an option to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of execution of the extended agreement that shall vest and become exercisable as to 10,000 shares of Common Stock on the last day of each 30 day period during the extended term of the consulting agreement, subject in each case to the continued effectiveness of the extended agreement. In the event of full time employment of the consultant this vesting will be accelerated. All of such shares are subject to a six month period during which Consultant has agreed none of these shares will be sold. This issuance of shares was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The value of these shares is $19,000 and the value of these options is approximately $18,000.
 
-14-


On July 28, 2008, in furtherance of the Company’s desire to increase its presence in the health and wellness industry, the Company entered into a two year consulting agreement with Margula Company LLC (“Margula”), pursuant to which Margula will provide various promotional services to the Company, including various speaking engagements (the “Margula Consulting Agreement”). These services will be primarily provided through Suzanne Somers. In consideration therefor, the Company will issue to Margula a five year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.78 per share (the closing price of the Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on the commencement date of the agreement) (the “Commencement Date”), which shall vest and become exercisable as to: (i) 200,000 shares upon the completion of a stated milestone; (ii) 100,000 shares upon the earlier of the completion of a stated milestone and December 31, 2008; (iii) 100,000 shares upon the earlier of the completion of an additional stated milestone and December 31, 2008; (iv) 100,000 shares upon the earlier of the completion of a stated milestone and September 30, 2009; and (v) 4,167 shares on each monthly anniversary of the Commencement Date through July 28, 2010 (with the final monthly vesting being 4,159), so long as on the respective vesting date the Margula Consulting Agreement shall not have been terminated. The effectiveness of the Warrant is subject to the prior approval of the American Stock Exchange. Pursuant to the terms of the Warrant, the Company is required to prepare and file no later than February 1, 2009, a Registration Statement with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant. This issuance of securities was approved by the Board of Directors. The value of these warrants is approximately $394,000.
 
The Company currently intends to meet its cash requirements in the near term through financing activities and is also actively in the process of identifying an acquisition transaction or collaborative arrangement, both domestically and abroad, that will generate revenue. In the event these activities are not successful, the Company would need to curtail its operations. In August 2008, several members of senior management and senior staff voluntarily deferred the receipt of some or all of their salary until additional capital is raised.
 
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report, statements that are not statements of current or historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "plan", "intend," "may," "will," "expect," "believe", "could," "anticipate," "estimate," or "continue" or similar expressions or other variations or comparable terminology are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, (i) the Company’s ability to manage the business despite continuing operating losses and cash outflows; (ii) the Company’s ability to obtain sufficient capital or a strategic business arrangement to fund its operations; (iii) the Company’s ability to build the management and human resources and infrastructure necessary to support the growth of the business; (iv) competitive factors and developments beyond the Company’s control; (v) scientific and medical developments beyond the Company’s control; (vi) the Company’s inability to obtain appropriate governmental licenses or any other adverse effect or limitations caused by government regulation of the business; (vii) whether any of the Company’s current or future patent applications result in issued patents; and (viii) the other factors listed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 and other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available for review at www.sec.gov under “Search for Company Filings.”  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

GENERAL
 
NeoStem is engaged in a platform business of operating a commercial autologous (donor and recipient are the same) adult stem cell bank and is pioneering the pre-disease collection, processing and long-term storage of stem cells from adult donors that they can access for their own future medical treatment.  We are managing a network of adult stem cell collection centers in major metropolitan areas of the United States. We have also entered the research and development arenas, through the acquisition of a worldwide exclusive license to an early-stage technology to identify and isolate rare stem cells from adult human bone marrow, called VSEL (very small embryonic-like) stem cells. VSELs have many physical characteristics typically found in embryonic stem cells, including the ability to differentiate into specialized cells found in substantially all the different types of cells and tissue that make up the body. On January 19, 2006, we consummated the acquisition of the assets of NS California, Inc., a California corporation (“NS California”) relating to NS California’s business of collecting and storing adult stem cells.  Effective with the acquisition, the business of NS California became our principal business, rather than our historic business of providing capital and business guidance to companies in the healthcare and life science industries.  The Company provides adult stem cell processing, collection and banking services with the goal of making stem cell collection and storage widely available, so that the general population will have the opportunity to store their own stem cells for future healthcare needs. 

-15-

 
The adult stem cell industry is a field independent of embryonic stem cell research which the Company believes is more likely to be burdened by governmental, legal, ethical and technical issues than adult stem cell research. Medical researchers, scientists, medical institutions, physicians, pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies are currently developing therapies for the treatment of disease using adult stem cells. As these adult stem cell therapies obtain necessary regulatory approvals and become standard of care, patients will need a service to collect, process and bank their stem cells. The Company intends to provide this service.

Initial participants in our collection center network have been single physician practices who opened collection centers in California, Pennsylvania and Nevada. Revenues generated by these early adopters have not been significant and are not expected to become significant. However, these centers have served as a platform for the development of the Company’s business model and the Company redirected its focus to multi-physician and multi-specialty practices in major metropolitan areas. Toward this end, the Company signed an agreement in June 2008 for a New York City stem cell collection center and anticipates this facility being operational in the fall of 2008. In July 2008, the Company signed an agreement for a Santa Monica, California based stem cell collection center to be opened by Stem Collect of Santa Monica LLC at The Hall Center and anticipates this facility being operational in the summer of 2008. Additionally, the Company signed an agreement with Celvida LLC pursuant to which a Southern Florida stem cell collection center located in Coral Gables, a suburb of Miami, is targeted to open in September 2008.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months June 30, 2007
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, total revenues were $23,500 compared to $6,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The revenues generated in the three months ended June 30, 2008 are a combination of revenues from start up fees collected from physicians in the Company’s physician’s network, stem cell collection fees and monthly stem cell storage fees and the revenues generated in the three months ended June 30, 2007 were principally derived from a stem cell collection in the period.
 
Selling, general and administration expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 has increased by $419,000 or 21% over the three months ended June 30, 2007, from $1,960,400 to $2,379,000. During the last two years the Company has used a variety of equity instruments to pay for services in an effort to minimize its use of cash to incentivize staff and consultants and in the quarter ending June 30, 2008 the use of equity instruments was the primary source of increase in operating expenses. The use of equity instruments to pay for staff compensation, director fees, investor relations activities and investment banking services increased our operating expenses by $304,000, or 41%. Operating expenses funded by cash were $1,339,200 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared with $1,230,700 in cash funded expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $108,500 or 9%. The increase in expenses was primarily related to an increase in salary and benefits of $84,300, investor relations activities of $81,600, and fees associated with registering additional shares on the American Stock Exchange of $38,000. These expense increases were offset by a reduction in legal fees of $101,600 and a reduction in a variety of other expenses that resulted in a net expense reduction of $6,200.
 
For the reasons cited above the net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $2,361,800 from $1,958,300 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Six Month Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months June 30, 2007
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, total revenues were $24,200 compared to $61,900 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The revenues generated in the six months ended June 30, 2008 are a combination of revenues from start up fees collected from physicians in the Company’s physician’s network, stem cell collection fees and monthly stem cell storage fees and the revenues generated in the six months ended June 30, 2007 were principally a combination of revenues from start up fees collected from physicians in the Company’s physician’s network, stem cell collection fees and monthly stem cell storage fees. The reduction in revenues was due primarily to a reduction in fees collected from physicians in the Company’s physician’s network. The Company has reduced its activity in recruiting physicians and is concentrating its efforts on recruiting clients into the existing network in major metropolitan areas.

-16-

 
Selling, general and administration expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 has increased by $1,068,000 or 28% over the six months ended June 30, 2007, from $3,835,700 to $4,903,700. During the last two years the Company has used a variety of equity instruments to pay for services in an effort to minimize its use of cash to incentivize staff and consultants and in the six months ended June 30, 2008 the use of equity instruments was the primary source of increase in operating expenses. The use of equity instruments to pay for staff compensation, director fees, investor relations activities and investment banking services increased our operating expenses by $1,130,000, or 87%. Operating expenses funded by cash were $2,470,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared with $2,534,200 in cash funded expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of $64,000 or 3%. The decrease in cash funded operating expenses was primarily related to a decrease in legal expense of $265,200, consulting fees of $93,500, laboratory expenses of $22,700 and laboratory validations expenses of $64,800, which decreases were offset by increases in salary and benefits of $213,300, marketing expenses of $41,400, depreciation expense of $18,000, office supplies of $15,000, telephone expense of $5,500, rent of $21,800, investor relations activities of $8,500, fees associated with registering additional shares on the American Stock Exchange of $52,200 and a variety of other expenses that resulted in a net expense increase of $6,300.
 
For the reasons cited above the net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $4,889,000 from $3,774,600 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
General
 
At June 30, 2008, the Company had working capital of $371,000. The Company generates revenues from its adult stem cell collection activities. To date, our revenues generated from such activities have not been significant and we had minimal adult stem cell collection activity in the first six months of 2008. The Company has met its immediate cash requirements through an offering of common stock and warrants completed in May 2008 in the amount of $900,000. The Company currently intends to meet its cash requirements in the near term through further financing activities and is also actively in the process of identifying an acquisition transaction or collaborative arrangement, both domestically and abroad, that will generate revenue. In the event these activities are not successful, the Company would need to curtail its operations. In August 2008, several members of senior management and senior staff voluntarily deferred the receipt of some or all of their salary until additional capital is raised.
 
The following chart represents the net funds provided by or used in operating, financing and investment activities for each period indicated:
 
   
 
Six Months Ended
 
   
 
June 30, 2008
 
June 30, 2007
 
Cash (used) in Operating activities  
 
$
(2,698,000
)
$
(2,654,000
)
Cash (used) in investing activities  
 
$
(2,400)
))
$
(19,200
)
Cash provided by financing activities  
 
$
925,400
 
$
2,292,000
 
 
At June 30, 2008 the Company had a cash balance of $529,000, working capital of $371,000 and a stockholders’ equity of $1,732,000. The Company incurred a net loss of $4,889,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Such loss adjusted for non-cash items, including common stock, common stock option and common stock purchase warrant issuances which were related to services rendered of $2,408,000, and depreciation of $41,000 which was offset by cash settlements of various accounts payable, notes payable, accrued liabilities and increases in prepaid insurance expenses of $259,000, resulted in cash used in operations totaling $2,698,000 for the period ended June 30, 2008. Accordingly, the large difference between operating loss and cash used in operations was the result of a number of non-cash expenses charged to results of operations.

To meet its cash requirement for the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company relied on an offering of common stock and warrants completed in May 2008 and its existing cash balances. The Company believes that it will need to raise additional capital or acquire a revenue generating business within the next twelve (12) months in order to fund operations. The Company’s history of losses and liquidity problems may make it difficult to raise additional funding. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding on terms acceptable to the Company. Any equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders and debt financing, if available, may involve significant restrictive covenants.

-17-

 
In November 2007, the Company acquired the exclusive, worldwide rights to very small embryonic like (VSEL) technology developed by researchers at the University of Louisville. These rights were acquired through the Company’s acquisition of Stem Cell Technologies, Inc., the licensee to a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with the University of Louisville. Concurrent with acquiring these rights, the Company entered into a sponsored research agreement (the "Sponsored Research Agreement" or "SRA") with the University of Louisville Research Foundation (“ULRF”) under which the Company will support further research in the laboratory of Mariusz Ratajczak, M.D., Ph.D., a co-inventor of the VSEL technology and head of the Stem Cell Biology Program at the James Graham Brown Cancer Center at the University of Louisville. The term of the research is two and one-half years and shall commence after all applicable institution (e.g., institutional review board ("IRB")) and Federal approvals are obtained and upon the adult stem cell specimens required for the research being provided to the laboratory. The License Agreement requires the payment of certain license fees, royalties and milestone payments, payments for patent filings and applications and the use of due diligence in developing and commercializing the VSEL technology. The SRA requires periodic and milestone payments. All payments required to be made to date have been made. Under the License Agreement, upon the commencement of the research (which has not yet occurred pending receipt of IRB approvals and collection of the appropriate samples), the Company will be required to make payments of $66,000 in license issue fees and prepayment of patent costs and will be responsible for additional patent-related costs. Thereafter, an annual license maintenance fee of $10,000 will be required upon the issuance of a licensed patent and royalties will be payable based upon the sale of certain licensed products. Under the Sponsored Research Agreement, the Company agreed to support the research as set forth in a research plan in an amount of $375,000. Such costs are to be paid by the Company in accordance with a payment schedule which sets forth the timing and condition of each such payment over the term of the SRA, the first payment of $100,000 (for which there is a $50,000 credit) being due upon the commencement of the research. We will require additional research and development capacity and access to funds to meet our development obligations under the License Agreement and develop the VSEL technology. The Company has applied for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants and may also seek to obtain funds through applications for other State and Federal grants, direct investments, sublicensing arrangements as well as other funding sources to help offset all or a portion of these costs We are seeking to develop increased internal research capability and sufficient laboratory facilities or establish relationships with third parties to provide such research capability and facilities. In this regard, in July 2008 the Company hired a Director of Stem Cell Research and Laboratory Operations.

In October 2007, the Company entered into a development agreement with Stem Collect LLC (“Stem Collect”) to act as a developer of collection centers to join the Company’s network. Stem Collect agreed to make certain upfront payments of which $30,000 were paid through December 31, 2007. In December 2007, the parties amended the terms of this agreement to provide for the extension of certain other payment and notice periods under the development agreement and in March 2008 Stem Collect advised the Company that due diligence resulting in their revising their targeted locations and associated funding requirements were requiring that Stem Collect have additional time to meet its notice and payment obligations under the development agreement. After discussions between the parties, the original development agreement was terminated, and the Company anticipates discussing the terms of a new development agreement with Stem Collect. Pursuant to the original development agreement, a center agreement had been entered into with Stem Collect of Beverly Hills, LLC which has been replaced by a center agreement entered into in July 2008 with Stem Collect of Santa Monica, LLC for a center to be opened on the premises of The Hall Center in Santa Monica, California.
 
-18-

 
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are the Company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a complete, accurate and appropriate manner, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the Company's second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and the breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
 
-19-


NEOSTEM, INC.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Previously reported on the Company’s Current Reports on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2008, May 20, 2008 and July 24, 2008, respectively.
 
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

10.1 Form of Subscription Agreement among NeoStem, Inc. and certain investors listed therein. (1)
10.2 Form of Redeemable Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of NeoStem, Inc. (1)
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

(1)
Filed as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on Form 8-K, dated May 20, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated here by reference.
*
Filed herewith
**
Furnished herewith

-20-


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
NEOSTEM, INC. (Registrant)
     
 
By:
/s/ Robin Smith MD
   
Robin Smith MD, Chief Executive Officer
     
 
Date: August 14, 2008
 
 
     
 
By:
/s/ Larry A. May
   
Larry A. May, Chief Financial Officer
     
 
Date: August 14, 2008
 

 
-21-

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robin Smith, MD, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeoStem, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: August 14, 2008

/s/ Robin Smith MD
Name: Robin Smith, MD
Title: Chief Executive Officer of NeoStem, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
 

 
 
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Larry A. May, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeoStem, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
b)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: August 14, 2008

/s/ Larry A. May
Name: Larry A. May
Title: Chief Financial Officer of NeoStem, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
 

 
 
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Smith MD, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 14, 2008

/s/ Robin Smith MD
Robin Smith, MD
Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
 

 
 
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry A. May, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended ; and

 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 14, 2008

Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.